Fixing the MHS-5200A

Today we make some simple and cheap modifications in order to address the two biggest problems in the MHS5200A function generator: sine wave harmonic distortion, and square wave ringing/overshoot.

If you want to make the same modifications, here is the Digikey BOM. Note that the capacitors and inductors I used for the Bessel filter were 0402, while the pads on the PCB are 0603; either size fits, though 0402’s are obviously a bit harder to work with.

See the pictures below for more details.

Board Overview

Board Overview

Replacing the AD812 with the THS3092

Replacing the AD812 With the THS3092 (Be Sure to Replace the Heatsink!)

Modifying the DAC Filter(s)

Modifying the DAC Filter(s)

Bessel Filter Components

Bessel Filter Components

45 thoughts on “Fixing the MHS-5200A

  1. Nice! So assuming they deliberated over which op-amp to choose, do you think the TI chip only became half the price since the design was settled? Or do you think they had other reasoning for choosing that AD chip? Also I thought harmonics would indicate ringing in the feedback… wouldn’t the slew-rate increase mean that (potentially) harmonics could be stronger?

    • I doubt the prices have changed significantly (but maybe I’m wrong). They probably had a bunch of the AD812’s left over from another project, or got a good deal on them, but I’m really just guessing. I’ve no idea!

      In my previous videos I found that the harmonic content was actually due to distortion caused by the lack of required slew rate in the AD812 (sine waves looked more triangular), so an increase in slew rate was required.

    • The AD812’s might be dirt cheap fakes. Lots of fake ADI parts seem to come out of China. (Maybe it has something to do with ADI’s high prices?)

      • If they are fakes, they’re operating exactly the same as the ones that I bought from Digikey myself (see my previous videos on the MHS-5200A). Although I didn’t show it in the video(s), I did go so far as to replace the AD812 with one that I purchased from Digikey, with no affect.

  2. Fun videos, thanks. I would like to see the improvement in channel-1 with the op-amps in non-inverting configuration. Also, while your square wave looks better. It might be even better still if the Butterworth LPF corner frequency was higher (closer to double the maximum output frequency). I would like to know the elliptic filter component values you removed as well, I would try reverse engineering the original to see if perhaps staying with an elliptic filter but with different charactistics might be even better.

    • Yes, moving the cutoff frequency farther out would improve high frequency response, but at the expense of letting more high frequency noise through, so it’ll always be a trade off. It just depends on which characteristics you’re most concerned with! 🙂

      I don’t know the original values for the elliptic filter as I didn’t measure the inductors/capacitors after I pulled them. Given the characteristic sharp cutoff of the elliptic filter and the attenuation that I saw when approaching higher frequencies (20-25MHz), I’d guesstimate that the original filter was designed for a cutoff somewhere around 30MHz.

      I’m not sure that changing the elliptic filter values would really help much with ringing. While you could push the cutoff frequency out farther, AFAIK, the characteristic group delay of the elliptic filter would still be there. For example, the original filter clearly allowed frequencies up to ~15MHz through without any noticeable attenuation, a 10kHz square wave had just as much overshoot/ringing as a 5MHz square wave.

  3. Thanks for this. I purchased a unit from eBay and performed all the changes you recommended. It works like a champ! I did select different passives from DigiKey, namely selecting 0603 parts with one exception.

    • BOM:

      2 296-18836-5-ND IC OPAMP CFA 160MHZ 8SOIC
      2 490-8225-1-ND CAP CER 6.5PF 50V NP0 0402
      2 490-1430-1-ND CAP CER 130PF 50V 5% NP0 0603
      2 490-1344-1-ND CAP CER 51PF 100V 5% NP0 0603
      2 1276-1021-1-ND CAP CER 30PF 50V 5% NP0 0603
      2 445-16970-1-ND FIXED IND 560NH 100MA 1.05 OHM
      2 490-6926-1-ND FIXED IND 160NH 150MA 2.1 OHM
      2 399-9579-1-ND FIXED IND 330NH 150MA 2.1 OHM

      • I noted that you replaced the output drive opamps with a THS3092D (296-18836-5-ND) which has a slew rate of 5700 V/us +/- 15V. I was thinking about using the drop in replacement THS3062D (296-13821-5-ND) or THS3062DDA (296-13503-5-ND ) or THS3062DDAG3 (296-13503-5-ND ).

        My reasoning is that these are 300Mhz parts with a 7000 V/us slew rate. The only issues I can see are that the output drives are 145ma for the 3062 vs 280ma for the 3092 and the input offset of the 3062 is 700 uV vs 900 uV for the 3092.

        Do you think these higher slew rate opamps will improve the output more?

        • Also using +/-15V peak into 50 ohm yields a 300ma peak draw with a 212 rms current. No wonder the output falls off and it runs hotter than blazes. Both the 3092 and 3062 seem to be marginally powered though the 3062 would be more so if my calculations are correct. It seems that, for the faster 3062 the output voltage into a 50 ohm load would have to be restricted to about +/- 7.5V rms or about +/- 10V p-p.

          • From the datasheet:

            The THS3061 and THS3062 are not recommended
            for applications with repetitive signals (sine, square,
            sawtooth, or other types) that exceed 900 V/μs. Using
            this device in these types of applications results in an
            excessive current draw from the power supply and
            possible device damage. For applications with a high
            slew rate and repetitive signals, the THS3091 and
            THS3095 (singles) or the THS3092 and THS3096
            (duals) are recommended instead.

  4. My MHS-5200A is winging its way from China to the UK at this very moment. It cost about £47 approximately $70 which is not bad!
    I just wondered if anyone in the UK has carried out this modification and where they sourced their parts from and do they have an alternative BOM part numbers?
    True, I can get the parts from digikey UK but they want £12 shipping for £5 worth of components which seems very high for such a small order.

    Keep up the good work and I shall watch this site with great interest.

    • I don’t live in the UK, but I’d think your best bet would be Farnell/Element14. I don’t have a BOM for them though, so you’ll have to search their site to find the right parts (just make sure the capacitors have a C0G/NP0 dielectric constant).

      • Hello Craig, I have just been looking at the UK Farnell site and they want about £11 / $15, before shipping and taxes, for each of the THS3092D!! The best I can do on eBay is around $15 each – ouch.
        This ‘simple mod is looking to cost around 50% of the unit cost if the parts are either purchased in the UK or overseas.

        Don’t suppose any one in the US group has the BOM that I could buy from them at a sensible price?

        Kind regards


        • John and Craig,

          I learned bunches by reading this post, and then related posts on eevblog about DDS filters (including LTspice modeling):

          My MHS-5200a signal generator is on order, as are the parts from Mouser. I ordered all the passives in 0603 size, in quantity 10. The 6.5pF cap was not in stock, so i went with the 6.8 pF (modeling showed little difference). Because of what was in stock, and what Mouser carries, my choices were not exact, but pretty close. Unfortunately, i only ordered 1 spare THS opamp.

          The cost of the passives (quant 2 of each item) came out to only USD$ 1.28 . I’d be happy to send you 2 sets of passives as a way of paying it forward (you can forward one set to somebody else local to you). And we can figure something out if you want me to add more THS opamps with my next Mouser order. Send me an email at this address (it autoexpires in a few days ): abk_anazoo1 at spamex _dot_ com.

          I’ll let you know how the mod goes – and hopefully have before and after waveforms as well.

          Mouser # Manufacturer Desc. Order Qty. Price (USD) Ext.: (USD)
          595-THS3092D Texas Instruments High Speed Operational Amplifiers Dual Hig-Vltg Low Distortion 2 3.140 $6.28
          581-06031A6R8DAT2A AVX Multilayer Ceramic Capacitors 100volts 6.8pF C0G 2 0.100 $0.20
          81-GCM1885C2A300JA6D Murata Multilayer Ceramic Capacitors 30pF 100Volts C0G 5% 2 0.043 $0.09
          81-GRM1885C2A510JA1D Murata Multilayer Ceramic Capacitors 51pF 100Volts C0G 5% 2 0.045 $0.09
          81-GRM1885C2A131JA1D Murata Multilayer Ceramic Capacitors 130pF 100Volts C0G 0.05 2 0.054 $0.11
          810-MLF1608DR33J TDK Fixed Inductors 0603 0.33uH 5% 2 0.172 $0.34
          81-LQB18NNR56J10D Murata Fixed Inductors 1.6x.08mm 560nH 300mA+/-5% 2 0.107 $0.21
          81-LQW18ANR16J00D Murata Fixed Inductors 0603 160nH +/-5% DCR 2.10ohm 2 0.117 $0.23
          total (USD) $7.56


          • To clarify my overly obfuscated address:
            the first part is abk_anazoo1 (include the underscore)
            after the at sign it is
   (no underscores)


  5. Hello Adam,

    First of all, I am sorry for the delay in replying to your message – just the normal catch up jobs after Christmas and new year!

    I would like to take you up on your kind offer of the passive components and I can certainly pay you for them via PayPal or another method?
    It would be really helpful to me if you could also get hold of the THS op amps at a reasonable price and obviously I will pay for those as well.

    My unit has arrived and works exactly as predicted and, overall, I am very pleased with it.

    I look forward to hearing from you.

    Kind regards


  6. Hello Adam,

    I managed to open a Mouser account in the UK and their prices are much better than the others I have tried – postage is still a little high at £12!

    Is there anyone else in the UK who would like a set of parts ordered at the same time so as to reduce the postage cost?
    If so I can order an extra kit(s) for them and forward it when it gets to me.



  7. Hi,
    -is this mod just for CH1 or for both channel?
    -if I just want to mod CH1, do I still have to remove the 3 cap in blue (3rd pic)?

    -if I want to mod both CH1&2, should I replace the 3 caps on top row with 3 inductors, remove the resistors from middle row, and replace the 4 caps on 3rd row of the filter (and both amp chip) ? Are both caps & inductors on both filter are same order left to right as ch1?

    I haven’t received my unit yet so don’t know the original chip placement.

    • is this mod just for CH1 or for both channel?

      The modifcations can of course be done to either channel, but in the pictures above I’ve only shown channel 1 modified, while channel 2 is unmodified; that way you can see what the channel(s) look like before and after the mods.

      if I just want to mod CH1, do I still have to remove the 3 cap in blue (3rd pic)?

      No, if you don’t want to modify channel 2, then don’t make any changes to it. The removal of the 3 blue highlighted capacitors is the “lazy” version of the filter modification and can be done to either channel; you can do that instead of fully replacing the entire filter. It doesn’t work as well as a full replacement, but it’s a significant improvement.

      if I want to mod both CH1&2, should I replace the 3 caps on top row with 3 inductors, remove the resistors from middle row, and replace the 4 caps on 3rd row of the filter (and both amp chip) ?

      Yes, but those “resistors from the middle row” are actually inductors. 🙂 Regardless though, they should be removed. And yes, you’d want to replace both amplifier chips.

      Are both caps & inductors on both filter are same order left to right as ch1?

      Yes, the channel 1 and channel 2 filters are identical, so the component placement and order are the same for both.

  8. Hi, I’m looking for the parts at Element14 as I can not get delivery from digikey unless I want to chase couriers (they never deliver). I would also prefer to use 0603 parts. While looking at some of the specs for the inductors I noticed a frequency (self resonant frequency) spec. How close does this have to meet the specs in your BOM? Anything else I should know / consider when choosing parts?

  9. hi,
    My 12MHz version is on its way from China. Im gonna go with the filter mod. But Im not sure is there any real benefit in my case replacing the opamps as well.
    Whats your opinion?

    Craig great job BTW

    • My observation was that operation up to 12MHz was decent; only above that did the slew rate of the op amps start showing noticeable distortion. So if you want to skip replacing the op amps, that’s probably fine!

  10. it appears they may have changed the design. i just got a 25Mhz version today and i replaced the 2 ad812s, but non of the other components match up with your pictures.

  11. Hi, Craig!
    I’m sorry for my very strange and not in the subject question. But what you think about Klein Tools CL2000 meter? It really is true rms? Thanks.
    I’m sorry…

    • Hi Michael, I’ve never used the CL2000 myself, but it is a true RMS AC clamp meter that does DC measurements too, and seems to have been met with good reviews.

      FWIW I will say that I have used some of Klein Tools’ multimeters though, and for the price ($30) they are very good. In fact, we have about 30 of these multimeters at work; they get (ab)used by students in our hardware classes and banged around during international flights and they’ve never had a problem.

      • But why CL2000 don’t have any mention about crest factor for AC signals in it’s specs?
        Any Fluke true rms meter have one.

  12. I got one of these signal generators ~March 2016, and mine has the filters completely removed, just blobs of solder across the pads. Same AD812.

    I was thinking of adding an amplitude modulated output BNC jack to the side, using channel 1 and 2 multiplied together. I thought it would be easy, but multiplying seems to be harder than just adding the two channels together. Anyone able to steer me to a simple circuit for this?

  13. Hello,

    I purchased one of these from ebay, the same modified one as Robert Peck posted images of, and the square wave is just the same as your unmodified channel two.

    About all I can figure out is to replace the AD812’s.

    Too bad service manual schematics are not available for this thing.

  14. Thinking about buying this model – can anyone tell me whether the latest circuit design employing the active filter, improves the ringing on square wave?

  15. re: Paul;
    “can anyone tell me whether the latest circuit design employing the active filter, improves the ringing on square wave?”

    No, its really not any different than the original described here. My unit lasted for a day, then the output went very distorted. Two scopes showed two different waveforms being generated. After several attempts to contact the manufacturer, there was no response, even the ebay seller has no luck. I’m waiting for a replacement unit to arrive.

  16. Craig,

    Do you have the original software that works for this unit? The version that I have I can not figure out how to make the ARB function work. It says that it writes the file to the ARB memory but it never works. Just shows garbage. The original CD is corrupt but the file name is MHS-5200A_en5.01.exe I can’t find this version on the web. The version that I have does not even look like the one in the manual. Any chance you could put the contents of the whole CD up on a Google Drive link for me? Thanks

Leave a Reply to Philip Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *